Critics claimed the sealant is black, not the requested American flag blue. Starkey told me it is definitely blue. It is just a very dark shade that appears blue when held against black material.

On complaints that it does not reflect, Starkey explained that breeze or debris breaks the surface. When the water is calm, it reflects beautifully.

Regarding concerns about algae, Starkey noted that the National Park Service is managing changes, but the waterproofing itself is tight.

I asked about the allegations that they didn’t test waterproofing before filling the pool. Starkey confirmed they inspected every joint and seam. Filling the pool with water is the final test.

Finally, I asked about the timeline after critics called the repairs late. Starkey said they met the deadline of June 10. They have worked seven days a week, 12 to 14 hours a day since April 10.

What do you want to know?

Comment

I’m the only reporter Eddie Wood of Atlantic Industrial Coatings and Marcus Logan of Mid-America Industrial Coating granted access for their final walkthrough to ensure nothing was missed.

The contractors performed the repairs President Trump wanted. Waterproofing is complete. The pool now shows the promised mirror reflection of the Washington Monument.

I asked whether public perception shifted since my interview last week. Wood said people on the sidewalk are now  “99 plus percent positive.”

I asked about Trump’s project to repair the leaking World War II Memorial. Logan said “I would love to.”

I asked what they wanted to tell the American people. Wood responded, “Thank you for the opportunity to do what we got to do. It’s been an incredible experience and we’re honored to have been selected to do it.”

Logan added, “Very honored.”

What do you want to know about the Reflecting Pool? I’ll answer!

Comment

See my exclusive interview with the contractor, Eddie Wood of Atlantic Industrial Coating about where to see the water and how to works.

More updates coming!

Comment

Share

I’m the only reporter on the ground tracking every step of this massive project and the only one who got inside the fence.

DETAILS: Workers finished spraying the final “American flag blue” Rhino coating. They put back the grate covers and will do a power wash. The water test is scheduled for tomorrow.

Once the cleaning and testing are done, the water refill will take 7 to 10 days.

Follow me for daily on-the-ground updates from Washington @emilymillerdc 🇺🇸🏃‍♀️

*The footage inside this video was captured on Monday, right before the government cut off access.

Comment

I’ve been running around the Reflecting Pool for more than 20 years and I’ve never seen this many helicopters over the site.

The helicopters appeared over the Washington Monument, then flew over the World War II Memorial and the Reflecting Pool while crews continue work on the repairs.

I asked the White House whether President Trump was aboard.

No response.

Trump previously conducted a helicopter flyover after returning from China.

Could this have been another one?

Watch the video and tell me what you think.

Comment

I’m the only reporter with access inside the pool.

DETAILS: The president chose “American flag blue” shade of Rhino coating to seal the leaks. The spray dries in just seven seconds.

The final work is to spray the sides, back wall near the memorial, center trench and expansion joints.

The massive pool leaked 40 thousand gallons a day.

Workers also showed me the primed center trench and the last end wall still waiting to be sprayed before this phase is complete.

Sign up for me for on-the-ground updates from Washington!

Share

Leave a comment

I went inside and asked the crew your questions for part one of the videos.

What is President Trump’s “American flag blue” sealant going to do?

Will the Reflecting Pool still reflect the Lincoln and Washington Monument with a dark blue bottom?

Answers in the video.

The crew is still working on the joints and waiting for a less windy day to apply the final spray sealant.

They have been working seven days a week since April 10. They told me they are are honored to restore a national monument. They love walking into the pool every day. They are humble. They are patriots.

I have been running around the Lincoln Memorial for more than 20 years. Getting to see the leaks finally being repaired and watching how much these men care about their work was one of the best days of my life.

I’ll answer more of your questions in my next videos. Hit subscribe for free 🇺🇸

Subscribe

Did I answer your question?

Comment

Comment

Free post to get all your questions answered!

Share

Read more

The actor shot his cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the “Rust” movie set in Oct. 2021 and then walked outside while she bled to death on the floor. But he will face no consequences.

The prosecutor was totally outgunned by Baldwin’s high-price legal team. The jury was not even in the Santa Fe courtroom when the trial ended.

New ammo in evidence

Baldwin was charged (twice) with two counts of manslaughter for breaking all gun safety rules in a reckless manner when he shot and killed Hutchins. 

The decision to dismiss the case was due to rounds of ammunition that weren’t given to the defense before trial. One round apparently looked like dummies found on set. 

The judge agreed with the defense that the evidence could be prejudicial against Baldwin and could have been used to prepare for trial. The newly discovered ammunition did not explain the source of the “live round” that was in Baldwin’s revolver.

My story earlier today explains more in-depth the issues at court that led to this shocking outcome. Read it here: 

This shocking ruling is a travesty of justice. It shows, once again, that there are two systems of justice for the rich and powerful and for regular people. 

Baldwin will now go back to his big New York City apartment with his seven children and Spanish wife and film their new reality TV show like nothing happened.

Meanwhile, Halyna’s young son does not have a mother. The armorer Hannah Guttierez Reed, who just loaded the gun, is in prison for 18 months.

Share

This ruling has nothing to do with politics...

Read more

In a dramatic turn of events, his high-priced lawyers demanded the judge dismiss the case over rounds of ammunition that no one seemed to know about before.

Is he getting a dismissal or a plea deal?

Baldwin hugged and conferred with his wife Hilaria/Hillary several times (watch one below) after the jury was dismissed until Monday. He is on trial for shooting and killing his cinematographer Halyna Hutchins in Oct. 2021 on the “Rust” movie set.

The Ammo

The defense team alleges the state withheld important evidence before trial. Special Prosecutor Kari Morrissey said she hadn’t seen the rounds in person before Thursday, but it was a “wide goose chase” because the photo showed it didn’t match the live ammo on set.

Then the judge had the ammo brought into the courtroom. She put on blue gloves and touched the evidence herself.

Sheriff Deputy Alexandria Hancock testified she put the ammo in a different case number. She also said it matched somewhat with dummy rounds on set. Then it was determined that one round matched dummies on the set.

The rounds of ammunition in question were given to the Sheriff’s office in March, the day that armorer Hannah Gutierrez Reed was convicted and started serving her 18-month prison sentence. It was given by a “Good Samaritan” named Troy Teske. He is a police officer and also a friend of Reed’s father, the veteran Hollywood armorer Thell Reed.

Share

Baldwin’s powerful lawyers called for the case to be dismissed because the prosecution was allegedly hiding evidence. The court restarted at 1 pm MT without announcing a deal.

I’m just….

Read more

Bowles said Special Prosecutor Kari Morrissey messaged him late Thursday night to say she’s not calling Reed to the stand.

Reed’s lawyer, Jason Bowles, had told me on Thursday that she was going to take the 5th on the witness stand because of her pending appeal. Bowles said she would testify against Baldwin if the state would give her immunity.

Reed was recently moved from prison to a jail in Santa Fe for the trial. Bowles said the prosecutor Kari Morrissey is keeping Reed in the nearby jail. This means she may still be called to testify during the second week of the trial.

Reed’s testimony would be key to proving Baldwin…

Read more

However, Baldwin dramatically changed his defense during Wednesday's manslaughter trial opening arguments about the shooting on the “Rust” movie set.

Pulled the Trigger

Defense counsel Alex Spiro began by showing the jury the video (below) of Baldwin earlier on the day of the shooting with his finger inside the trigger guard. This seemingly damning evidence was addressed as Spiro introduced the new defense.

Spiro then looked up at the Santa Fe jury and said, “No one saw him intentionally pull the trigger.”

“Intentionally.” Spiro repeated it multiple times. 

A stone-faced Baldwin watched his lawyer essentially say the actor has lied for almost three years.

You’ll remember that Baldwin got off the manslaughter charge the first time by claiming the gun had been altered so it could fire without a trigger pull. But I predicted a year ago that he would face a jury trial.

Spiro said that even if the prosecution’s can prove he pulled the trigger -- which they will with expert witnesses on firearms -- it doesn’t matter. 

“If he did [pull the trigger], of course, that would only make his statement incorrect,” claimed Spiro. “That would mean he misspoke, was incorrect.”

The defense attorney claimed pulling the trigger was a non issue either way. 

“Even if he intentionally pulled the trigger...That doesn’t make him guilty of homicide,” said Spiro. “He did not know the gun was loaded with a live bullet.”

Actor’s Privileges

Spiro claimed the actor has special privileges and does not need to adhere to the safety rule to always check to see if a firearm is loaded. There was one real bullet in the revolver. 

“Actors don't check the weapon. Safety is ensured by someone else,” said Spiro.

He said the crew was responsible for checking to see if the gun was loaded for Baldwin. He blamed the “live round” in the gun on armorer Hannah Gutierrez Reed, who was convicted of manslaughter, and Assistant Director Dave Halls, who pled guilty to a lesser charge. 

Spiro argued that actors can’t check their own guns because of their creative process. “The gun has to be safe before it’s put in the actor’s hand because he’s thinking about his role as Harlan Rust,” claimed the attorney.

Special Prosecutor Erlinda O. Johnson said earlier in the day:

The evidence will show that someone who made ‘make believe’ with a real gun and violated the cardinal rules of firearns safety is the defendant Alexander Baldwin.

Johnson explained to the jury, “While it was a movie set, it was a real workplace... A prop gun is a real gun.” She said that every time Baldwin was handed the gun, he never did a safety check with the “inexperienced armorer.”

The defense claimed Baldwin didn’t want to “offend” Hannah.

Case Against Baldwin

Before the defense essentially admitted Baldwin pulled the trigger, the prosecution described what their witnesses will say about the claim.

“Firearm experts will tell you that gun will not discharge without a pull of that trigger,” said Johnson.

The prosecutor explained that “because the defendant is claiming he didn’t pull the trigger,” the state had forensic testing on it by the FBI and an independent expert. 

(Watch below when Baldwin declared on ABC that he didn’t pull the trigger.)

FBI expert Brye Ziegler will testify that, in tests, “not once did the gun malfunction or discharge on its own.”

Independent and highly respected firearm expert Lucien Haig will testify that the “gun the defendant asked to be assigned worked perfectly fine as it was designed.”

Johnson spelled out how Baldwin didn’t adhere to any of the three gun safety rules -- check if the gun is loaded, put your finger on the trigger only when you’re ready to shoot and keep the gun pointed in a safe direction.

Instead, Baldwin intentionally pointed the gun at Hutchins, with director Joel Souza behind her. Baldwin blamed Hutchins for telling him to point it at her.

“He pointed the gun at another human being, cocked the hammer and pulled the trigger in reckless disregard for Ms. Hutchins’s safety,” declared the prosecution. “For justice to be served, the only true verdict is guilty.”

Baldwin’s defense countered: “Justice is the truth. Alec Baldwin committed no crime.”

Was Baldwin Lying About Not Pulling the Trigger?

Spiro left open the possibility that the defense would revert back to Baldwin’s claim that he did not pull the trigger. He said the gun owner's manual said it can “go off” from being dropped. 

Share

As I’ve written in the past, Baldwin most likely believed in the beginning, he didn’t pull the trigger because of the complicated firearm maneuver. He did a cross draw-- which means taking the gun out of a holster with your opposite hand. He had refused the armorer’s request that he train to do the maneuver.

Plus,

Read more

Baldwin showed up Tuesday morning outside court with his wife Hilaria and the youngest of their seven kids. Hilaria — who lied for years about being from Spain — held the baby girl for a photo op and then put her on the ground in front of the press.

Next, Baldwin came from his separate black SUV and walked over to his wife and baby as the cameras rolled. He tried to get the baby to “come to daddy,” but he didn’t succeed. Watch here.

The Baldwins’ photo op seemed to work with the clicking of cameras. The actor then left his family and walked ahead into the courthouse for the start of jury selection for his manslaughter trial.

But when Hilaria handed the baby to a nanny, the child started screaming and crying in front of the press. You can watch the crying baby video here, courtesy of Angenette Levy from the Law & Crime network.

Baldwin’s wife looked back once at the baby crying but kept walking into court. They left the impression of uncaring parents who used their child as a prop. The stunt was a failure.

Baldwin’s Monday Surprise

As I’m registered media for the trial, I’m on the court’s public affairs media advisory list. They warned that Baldwin was not supposed to be in court on Monday for pretrial hearings. He filed this waiver of personal appearance for all pretrial proceedings in the case.

However, Baldwin surprised everyone by showing up with his legal team and walking into the courthouse to a pool of photographers.

Once seated at the defense table on camera, the actor appeared calm and neutral during the proceedings. He wore black-rimmed glasses, a suit and tie and close-shaven gray hair. His lack of reactions showed he was media-trained and well-prepared by his defense team.

Part of the intrigue of this trial is whether he will lose his cool during the testimony. Remember, Baldwin punched a man over a parking spot. He recently knocked the phone out of the hand of an annoying protestor.

Baldwin’s Big Win

Baldwin's defense scored a significant victory when Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer ruled that the special prosecutors could not introduce evidence about Baldwin's role as a producer for "Rust."

This limits the state's ability to argue that Baldwin was responsible for the set's safety issues, focusing the case solely on his actions as an actor handling the gun. This greatly narrows the state’s ability to give the jury options on why to convict him.

Baldwin’s expensive legal team— Luke Nikas and Alex Spiro— is very talented and seemed to quickly overpower New Mexico State Prosecutor Kari Morrissey. The defense cannot be underestimated to convince a jury that there is reasonable doubt that Baldwin is guilty of recklessness with a gun.

Guilty or Not? 

Almost three years ago, I bucked the big media narrative that Baldwin would get away with it because he’s an actor. I wrote in my first story to you after the shooting: 

The Hollywood version of the Alec Baldwin story is that the actor killed a woman with a prop gun and a blank and is not at fault.

The true story is that Baldwin shot two people with a real gun and did not follow firearm safety rules.

I believe that is still the simple case now. Baldwin does not get special legal privileges for being an actor. He failed to check if the gun was loaded with a real bullet, pointed it directly at Halyna Hutchins and pulled the trigger—a fact that will be confirmed by expert witnesses.

Covering the Trial

After reading some of your encouraging comments in my last email, I finally decided Sunday night to buy a one-way ticket to Santa Fe and book a hotel. I was excited to cover the trial directly from the courthouse, even if I couldn’t get a seat in the courtroom.

For the first time, I was traveling without being paid by a media outlet that would also cover my travel costs. Your financial support would have been crucial for this independent reporting effort.

However, as I watched the televised pretrial hearings on Monday, I saw very little public or media attention for the trial. Pres. Biden’s death watch has completely taken over the news (rightly so.) Even if I managed to get an exclusive scoop from sources on the ground, my work probably would not get much readership.

It’s hard to say if the Baldwin trial will gain traction in the way the ones for Johnny Depp and Alex Murdaugh did. The second week of the trial is more unlikely to see a surge in interest since it overlaps with the RNC Convention, where Donald Trump will be the center of attention.

Late last night,

Read more

Please read about the possible t…

Read more

Subscribe now

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the devices that make a semiautomatic gun’s trigger fire faster are not banned by law.

"We hold that a semiautomatic rifle equipped with a bump stock is not a ‘machinegun’ because it cannot fire more than one shot 'by a single function of the trigger.' And, even if it could, it would not do so ‘automatically,” wrote Thomas.

He explained why this is not a Second Amendment issue but rather about the federal government’s power to interpret laws and regulations.

"ATF therefore exceeded its statutory authority by issuing a Rule that classifies bump stocks as machine guns.”

Justice Samuel Alito wrote that Congress can pass a law to ban bump stocks, which seems to mean the devices may still be banned under the Bruen ruling.

Pres. Joe Biden responded to the SCOTUS ruling by calling on Congress to pass a law to ban bump stocks. This will surely be a new campaign issue for him.

You’ll remember I interviewed the plaintiff Michael Cargill when his case was first heard by the high court in February.

He explained his five-year journey to fight in the courts and to get back his own bump stocks in the story below.

Cargill, who owns Central Texas Gun Works in Austin, said on Thursday that this ruling will force the government to rescind its ban on arm braces and the requirement that gun parts have serial numbers.

He turned in two bump stocks to the ATF in 2018 when the ruling went into effect. He should be able to get them back now.

Share

My view on bump stocks is…

Read more

“I own a couple of different guns,” replied Trump. “But I don’t talk about it.” 

I wrote about part of this interview in my book “Emily Gets Her Gun” but left out how exactly I got the answer from Trump. Paid subscribers can read the full story for the first time at the end. 

Subscribe now

The .45 and .38

Despite Trump’s denial, I persisted because he had never disclosed the guns publicly. I wanted an exclusive. 

In the end, I learned about two handguns Trump registered with New York City Police: an H&K (Heckler & Koch) in .45 caliber and a Smith & Wesson .38 caliber. 

(I’m not aware of any other reporter since who has asked Trump what guns he owns, so thank you to The Daily Mail’s Nikki Schwab for crediting me as the source!)

Trump didn’t regret telling me Instead, he tweeted out my story, “Donald Trump’s guns.” 

Where Are His Guns Now? 

After Trump was indicted in the Stormy Daniels case in March 2023, he turned over two of the pistols he was licensed to carry in the city to the New York Police Department (NYPD.)

A senior police official told CNN that a third gun registered on Trump’s carry permit “was lawfully moved to Florida.”

I called the NYPD and asked if the two guns Trump turned in were the Smith & Wesson and H&K. The detective told me to “wait for a response from the email team.” I also asked what happened to the guns given to NYPD. (They could go for a lot on the resale market! ) So far, no response. 

Concealed Carry License

The NYPD source also said that Trump’s concealed carry permit was “quietly suspended” on April 1, 2023. The NYPD is going to revoke the permit any day now, according to police sources. 

Trump lost his right to keep and bear arms when he was convicted of 34 state felonies in the Stormy Daniels trial. Convicted felons can not possess guns under the Gun Control Act of 1968. 

So Trump can’t have a carry permit. That Florida gun will have to be turned over or given away.

When I interviewed Trump on Fox TV in Dec. 2014, I asked a question from a viewer on social media: 

Do you think you’re privileged in having a concealed carry permit in NY? Is it a privilege for you because you’re wealthy and powerful?

“Well, I do,” replied Trump. This was before the landmark Supreme Court Bruen decision that overturned New York’s strict limits on who could carry a gun. 

“I have the right to carry a gun. I don't consider it a privilege. I consider it probably a necessity.”

“As you know, I’m a big— as you are, Emily— Second Amendment person,” Trump continued. “So the bad guys have it. The good guys have to have it. And I’m a very staunch proponent in being able to protect yourself.”

Why Did Trump Give Up His Guns? 

It’s not clear what law mandated Trump to turn over his guns to the police when he was indicted. 

A longtime firearms attorney pointed out to me part of the Gun Control Act says it is illegal for a person under indictment for a crime punishable by more than a year in prison to send or receive guns interstate. 

That further confuses the police statement that Trump was able to legally move one gun from NYC to Florida after being indicted.

It doesn’t explain giving up the Smith and Wesson and H&K. 

Please let me know if you know of a New York state or city criminal law that made Trump turn over his guns a year ago after getting indicted.

Leave a comment

Emily Gets Her (Trump) Guns (Story)

I introduced myself to Trump as he walked with his huge entrouage into the Ritz-Carlton in Sarasota, Florida. Seconds later, he invited me up to his hotel suite…

Read more

“We're coming to TLC! God help you all,” Baldwin said while smiling, as his seven small kids ran screaming through their gigantic New York City apartment.  

Home or Court TV

Alec, 66, and his wife “Hilaria”, 40, laughed and joked in the Instagram video (below) promoting “The Baldwins,” which will air in 2025. Hilaria said in her trademark fake Spanish accent that the couple is “done having kids” after seven.

"We're inviting you into our home to experience the ups and downs, the good, the bad, the wild and the crazy," said Baldwin. "Home is the place we love to be most." 

Home is not where Alec will be on July 9th. He will be in a Santa Fe courtroom to defend himself against charges of violating all gun safety rules and causing the death of the young mother, Hutchins, on the “Rust” movie set in 2021.

I can think of three possible motives for this reality show.

Motive 1: Jury

The timing of Baldwin’s video promo showcasing a happy family life could be an attempt to influence potential jurors to believe he might be a decent person.

This new family-friendly video contrasts sharply with his post-shooting interview on ABC News. He expressed no “guilt” for Hutchins' death and claimed he would not face criminal charges.

Baldwin blamed everything on Hutchins for telling him to point the gun at her and movie armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed for loading the gun with real ammunition.

Flashback:

He also wrongly declared that he would not get criminally charged and did not pull the trigger.

Compared to Balwin’s bad public image, Reed was virtually unknown to the jury.

The actor’s high-powered lawyers were in court during Reed’s trial. It must have rattled them that she was tried on the same charge, and it ended with a swift guilty verdict. The young woman was also slammed with a maximum 18 months in prison.

Motive 2: Money

Baldwin considers himself a big movie actor, so it’s curious he would do a cheesy reality TV show. It could mean he needs the money since he has the criminal and civil legal bills and the seven little kids.

(He has an eighth child, a daughter Ireland, from his first marriage to Kim Basinger. Some jurors may remember Baldwin called Ireland a “thoughtless little pig” on a voicemail when she was a child.)

Another sign he’s strapped for cash is that Baldwin took $10 million off his Long Island beach compound listing earlier this year. He filmed his own ad for his $19 million, watch it above.

Motive 3: Fake Spanish Wife, ‘Ven Aqui’

There’s no doubt that…

Read more

Hunter Biden’s federal trial for gun-related charges begins on Monday. Pres. Joe Biden’s son will have to sit in court every day and face a jury of his (more similar) peers in Delaware.

Before we delve in, let’s take a poll: 

(My votes, prediction and reasoning are below for paid subscribers.)

Subscribe now

HUNTER BIDEN

While Hunter has been accused of much bigger crimes— overseas business deals to benefit his father, tax evasion— the smoking gun got him into this trial. 

As jury selection begins, it has to scare young Biden that he could face up to 25 years in prison. Unlike Trump’s trial, Hunter’s is supposed to last only two weeks. 

Hunter has made multiple court attempts to postpone the trial and get the charges dropped. You’ll remember I wrote about his appeal that the federal law against drug addicts possessing firearms was a violation of his Second Amendment rights. 

U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika denied the filing but said he could use it on appeal. The Donald Trump nominated judge is presiding over the trial. 

Hunter says he’s sober now but was a cocaine addict. Drug users cannot possess guns under federal law.

Young Biden is charged with lying on the federal background check form, possessing an illegal gun and lying to a federally licensed gun dealer.

Love Affair Gone Bad

In 2018, Hunter admitted to police and the FBI that his then-girlfriend, Hallie (his deceased brother’s widow), threw his gun in a grocery store trash can. After speaking with Hunter, Hallie returned to retrieve the gun but couldn’t find it and called the police. 

Hunter cooperated and said he bought the Colt Cobra 38SPL revolver two weeks earlier. The local investigation finally recovered the gun but no charges were filed. 

A few years later, Hunter wrote in his memoir that at the time he bought the gun, he was smoking crack cocaine “every 15 minutes, seven days a week.” 

In 2021, Politico’s Tara Palmeri got a hold of the police report and the federal background check that Hunter signed. On the 4473 form, Biden checked “no” on the box that asked:

Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?

Lying on the background form is a federal crime that is not prosecuted as much as it should be by ATF and the Justice Department. But it’s these black-and-white facts that make Hunter’s case tough to defend.

How We Got Here

Political analysts and the media largely ignored Hunter’s gun case because it paled in comparison to the allegations of corrupt overseas dealings involving his father. However, we followed the gun charges closely.

In June 2023, the DoJ announced it made a sweetheart deal with Hunter (my story on it here.) The deal said the feds would wrap up its entire five-year investigation and let him plea to just misdemeanor tax charges. 

It also said he was charged with just one count of unlawful possession of a firearm by a person prohibited and but that his record would be wiped clean after a couple of years of probation.

All the attention at the time was on the “10% for the big guy” accusations that were buried. But the powerful gun lobby NSSF Chief Counsel Larry Keane told me of Hunter’s deal:

I think a poor African American or white defendant charged with the same thing would not get this kind of a deal.

Smoking Gun Stands

Just one month later, Judge Noreika shocked everyone by saying the plea deal could not go through. (My story here.) She said mixing immunity on a gun charge with a guilty plea on tax charges was not constitutional.

The judge also asked how Hunter’s immunity on the gun charge would apply to possible future charges in the ongoing investigation

Over the next few weeks, the prosecution and defense fought over whether the sweetheart deal was still on the table (story here.) Hunter’s team said the deal was valid and that Special Counsel David Weiss was trying to “renege” on a binding agreement. 

The DoJ stuck to its gun (pun intended, story here) and indicted Hunter on the three gun charges. Biden’s team tried to postpone the trial, saying he wasn’t ready, didn’t have the money and the aforementioned Second Amendment defense. 

Share

The Verdict:

I think the jury will…

Read more

The Jones, who became nationally known for suing the hospital…

Read more