You'll notice I changed the headline on this post since I sent out the email because I listened to podcasts all day to try to learn and realized I had made a podcast! I thought it needed to have the editing to make it REAL but mine just has the unedited me. I'll progress to professional and get an editor to take out the ums, uhs and make the audio louder. I'm laughing at myself that I thought this was "audio version" and that is the same as podcast.
I like it! You have a very conversational, easy-going tone and the audio allows us to hear which words and phrases you emphasize. You also employ some pauses very skillfully, which helps keep the listener's attention. And if the ums and uhs are in there, I don't think it makes that much of a difference. If anything, it comes across as more genuine!
I listen to podcasts on iHeart Radio, so I don't know if you can post it there or not. I really prefer to read material, rather than listen, since I can either read in detail or browse through the material to the salient points. I find I rarely have time to sit down and listen to 45 minutes of someone talking (I make an exception for Victor Davis Hanson). If a podcast is 15 minutes or less, I am more inclined to listen to it.
Love. Seriously. I can see this perhaps being a way to go into more/different detail about what you've written, kind of like a commentary track on a DVD.
Hi Emily! I have been a fan since you began your Emily Gets Her Gun series @ WT. My son's picture is also in your book. I mostly follow your 2A coverage, but being suspicious of the government, I've been really interested in your coverage of the Rona. The podcast was great! It wasn't perfect, but listening/watching people trying to be perfect on radio/TV hurts. You're easy to understand and follow and the little ums & ahhs make it real. I can tell you really care about your readers (listeners). Empathy is our greatest lack in America right now and the Federal government is the primary cause. I hope you podcast all of your stories.
Yes, I do like it. I think it should be an occasional thing, I know it takes extra time, but it really is a nice alternative. The sound is perfect, and of course as I would expect from you, it is very clear and easy to understand. As John pointed out, the picture was a nice feature as well.
I gave it a partial listen. The audio comes through nicely. From what I heard, your reading tone is clear, and your voice comes through very well with the words enunciated well. BTW, my CVS COVID 19 swab came in negative. BWH tomorrow morning for cross check. And also, the picture attached to this post is very nicely done. Looking very lovely.
I just listened, my first thought is I’m listening to a well versed friend. Someone who’s insights I trust. Your podcast is relatable and very easy to follow along. The sidebars were not too many. The pacing is good and I would not worry about the ‘Ahs’ and ‘ums’. I believe it’s inline with other public speakers who are speaking extemporaneously. Lastly, it’s good to encourage people to research on their own, draw their own conclusions. The 20ish minutes went quickly.
The one concern is your intended audience. I’d image that your base readership is made of like minded folks, people who seek the I intelligence you provide ( remember, for me, it’s not just your writing, but you also provide sources and data). We already believe in the value of your work. ( Speaking of your work, I just finished’Emily Gets Her Gun’… loved it!!)
How does the podcast capture the scared vaccinated or learned helpless people?
I say again ‘thank you’ I often vindicated in knowing my natural inclinations are inline with you and so many of my fellow subscribers.
You'll notice I changed the headline on this post since I sent out the email because I listened to podcasts all day to try to learn and realized I had made a podcast! I thought it needed to have the editing to make it REAL but mine just has the unedited me. I'll progress to professional and get an editor to take out the ums, uhs and make the audio louder. I'm laughing at myself that I thought this was "audio version" and that is the same as podcast.
You did very well! I still like to read info from you. I would keep it short to the point as you did here. Thanks Emily! Tim
This is cool for me, as a security guard I can listen and still pay attention at work :)
I like it! You have a very conversational, easy-going tone and the audio allows us to hear which words and phrases you emphasize. You also employ some pauses very skillfully, which helps keep the listener's attention. And if the ums and uhs are in there, I don't think it makes that much of a difference. If anything, it comes across as more genuine!
I enjoyed the free flow of your audio version. It feels conversational which is so much better than a polished podcast format.
I listen to podcasts on iHeart Radio, so I don't know if you can post it there or not. I really prefer to read material, rather than listen, since I can either read in detail or browse through the material to the salient points. I find I rarely have time to sit down and listen to 45 minutes of someone talking (I make an exception for Victor Davis Hanson). If a podcast is 15 minutes or less, I am more inclined to listen to it.
Love. Seriously. I can see this perhaps being a way to go into more/different detail about what you've written, kind of like a commentary track on a DVD.
Hi Emily! I have been a fan since you began your Emily Gets Her Gun series @ WT. My son's picture is also in your book. I mostly follow your 2A coverage, but being suspicious of the government, I've been really interested in your coverage of the Rona. The podcast was great! It wasn't perfect, but listening/watching people trying to be perfect on radio/TV hurts. You're easy to understand and follow and the little ums & ahhs make it real. I can tell you really care about your readers (listeners). Empathy is our greatest lack in America right now and the Federal government is the primary cause. I hope you podcast all of your stories.
Yes, I do like it. I think it should be an occasional thing, I know it takes extra time, but it really is a nice alternative. The sound is perfect, and of course as I would expect from you, it is very clear and easy to understand. As John pointed out, the picture was a nice feature as well.
I gave it a partial listen. The audio comes through nicely. From what I heard, your reading tone is clear, and your voice comes through very well with the words enunciated well. BTW, my CVS COVID 19 swab came in negative. BWH tomorrow morning for cross check. And also, the picture attached to this post is very nicely done. Looking very lovely.
Thank you Emily. Very informative! The Agency lost a gem in you.
I just listened, my first thought is I’m listening to a well versed friend. Someone who’s insights I trust. Your podcast is relatable and very easy to follow along. The sidebars were not too many. The pacing is good and I would not worry about the ‘Ahs’ and ‘ums’. I believe it’s inline with other public speakers who are speaking extemporaneously. Lastly, it’s good to encourage people to research on their own, draw their own conclusions. The 20ish minutes went quickly.
The one concern is your intended audience. I’d image that your base readership is made of like minded folks, people who seek the I intelligence you provide ( remember, for me, it’s not just your writing, but you also provide sources and data). We already believe in the value of your work. ( Speaking of your work, I just finished’Emily Gets Her Gun’… loved it!!)
How does the podcast capture the scared vaccinated or learned helpless people?
I say again ‘thank you’ I often vindicated in knowing my natural inclinations are inline with you and so many of my fellow subscribers.
-Arun.