I'm so glad that her patients have stood behind her as she takes on the entire medical field because all that matters is good medical care. Thank you for letting me know !
Thank you for standing up. If my post stays on FB long enough before being sensored and removed I have passionate friends that will share. May GOD'S HOLY SPIRIT give you PEACE during this time!
Dr Bowden is an amazing caring doctor she treated both me and my son with Ivermectin due to covid it works amazingly she got us the right dose in my opinion it’s the best thing for covid and it works for any stage of the vires Joanie Herring
The medical profession as well as the clinical literature profession is at the brink of ruin. The “science” behind the vaccine mandate hysteria is anything but. The vaccine does not provide immunity. It also does not help prevent spread. This is all about money, power and control. Unfortunately, many people have willingly handed over their freedom to a bureaucracy that ultimately has no interest in then. These same people would strip naked and run into oncoming traffic if it meant continuing access to Tik Tok.
Joe I was thinking about you when I was writing this because you've been saying this would happen all year and now it is and it's tragic. If the public cant trust the government and can't trust the doctors, what do we do?
Civil disobedience. People need to push back. Not be afraid to call BS on the lies. We just need to be fearless and understand that if push comes to shove, our Constitution is very clear regarding the necessary response to tyrannical rule. If some of our “betters” don’t stand up and fight for us, we may have no choice but to fight back. I thought results of last Tuesday’s elections would help, but it’s clear that we lived through a color revolution and for better or worse, Marxists have taken control of our government and we really need to call it out and stop pussy footing around.
Ivermectin is listed as the #2 drug to treat Covid-19 on NIHs own website. Also listed on PubMed https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/ Those who try to save themselves by saying they were only following orders, will not escape justice.
The lawyer told me today that NIH only moved it to that spot a couple months ago? That it as in a "not to use" category before? I need to et the back story clearer but things are showing that the the refusal all this time was totally political.
That's correct. Note that the neutral stance of NIH is the same level of support they offer for convalescent plasma. Yet Houston Methodist says Dr. Bowden is not following science while in their own article (Sept. 10) offering 5 reasons not to use ivermectin for COVID they give as the 5th reason that FDA approved methods already exist, and list convalescent plasma! (Along with monoclonal antibodies, which Dr. Bowden uses if she can get her hands on it, and remdesivir, which WHO recommends against, and for which scientific support is pretty sketchy, and some people suspect NIH/NIAID financial conflicts of interest on).
There is insufficient evidence for the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19. Results from adequately powered, well-designed, and well-conducted clinical trials are needed to provide more specific, evidence-based guidance on the role of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19.
Rationale
Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures.13 However, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies suggest that achieving the plasma concentrations necessary for the antiviral efficacy detected in vitro would require administration of doses up to 100-fold higher than those approved for use in humans.14,15 Even though ivermectin appears to accumulate in the lung tissue, predicted systemic plasma and lung tissue concentrations are much lower than 2 µM, the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro.16-19 Subcutaneous administration of ivermectin 400 µg/kg had no effect on SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in hamsters. However, there was a reduction in olfactory deficit (measured using a food-finding test) and a reduction in the interleukin (IL)-6:IL-10 ratio in lung tissues.20
Since the last revision of this section of the Guidelines, the results of several randomized trials and retrospective cohort studies of ivermectin use in patients with COVID-19 have been published in peer-reviewed journals or have been made available as manuscripts ahead of peer review. Some clinical studies showed no benefits or worsening of disease after ivermectin use,21-24 whereas others reported shorter time to resolution of disease manifestations that were attributed to COVID-19,25-27 greater reduction in inflammatory marker levels,26 shorter time to viral clearance,21 or lower mortality rates in patients who received ivermectin than in patients who received comparator drugs or placebo.21,27
However, most of these studies had incomplete information and significant methodological limitations, which make it difficult to exclude common causes of bias. These limitations include:
The sample size of most of the trials was small.
Various doses and schedules of ivermectin were used.
Some of the randomized controlled trials were open-label studies in which neither the participants nor the investigators were blinded to the treatment arms.
Patients received various concomitant medications (e.g., doxycycline, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, zinc, corticosteroids) in addition to ivermectin or the comparator drug. This confounded the assessment of the efficacy or safety of ivermectin.
The severity of COVID-19 in the study participants was not always well described.
The study outcome measures were not always clearly defined.
Those Who Created Covid WILL Hang—CCP Says It Won’t Be Them.
In 2019, National Biosafety Laboratory, Wuhan had leaked COVID-19 bioweapons.Deep State had introduced Covid-19 into US in order to allowed some states in US to use ‘mail-in ballots’ and ‘vote counters’ to remove President Trump from his seat.
What a blessing when doctors actually adhere to their vow! Ivermectin IS FDA approved and not approved by default 'emergency' label but truly tested and approved with little to no side affects. When someone is dying to deny a drug that scientifically stops the RNA production of the virus, is inhumane and honestly murder. Not only is it the best chance at survival, it is insane that anyone would have to even go to the courts to get approval for a doctor to dispense an FDA approved drug. What is this even about and why is this being allowed???? This is insanity! IF the 'vaccine' was truly a 'vaccine' that would be one thing but the point is that regardless if you are 'vaccinated' or not you CAN spread this virus. Why are we not combating it from all directions and with any potential drug that even is remotely effective? Please stick this out and do what is right MAYBE you can lead some doctors that may be on the fence and need a leader. Don't stop, continue to do the right thing! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufy2AweXRkc
I do appreciate this doctor being willing to treat the non vaxxed. She is certainly at her discretion to choose whom to render medical services too so long as she continues to observe the Hippocratic Oath.
She's brave to take this stand publicly.She said she did it so other doctors might too. I should have written in my story- and maybe will add-- is that unvaccinated also includes all the people with natural immunity who don't need the vaccine (despite the CDC push). So she's treating mostly people who are not going to get COVID but can't go to other doctors and facilities. Plus, she's treating those with COVID with antibodies and getting great results and keeping them out of the hospitals. For these things, the doctors in Houston are trashing her and trying to her license revoked. Shame.
I am a family nurse practitioner in Central Texas and was reported to the Board of Nursing last month for “inappropriately giving ivermectin to treat Covid” and currently fighting to keep my license if 25 years. 100% of my patients that received ivermectin early (meaning <7days since diagnosis) did very well, tolerated the medication with minimal side effects and recovered completely.
I was devastated that I was reported and my livelihood threatened. A patient asked me “if you knew that this fallout would occur, would you have written?”
And my answer is 1000 times yes, I would still have written because I know it saved 3 lives and it prevented prolonged illness and hospitalizations.
It is not against the Board of Nursing, the Texas Medical Board or the Texas State Board of Pharmacy to write FDA approved drugs for off-label use.
Why would any provider be attacked for writing a medication that not only did no harm but clearly decreased suffering?
Why is this still happening today? Ivermectin has been used in humans for almost 50 years. The article from the National Library of Medicine provides insight into just how safe and how much this one drug has helped in our effort to help people heal from a broad range of infection/disease. The failure of our current medical community and hospital administrators to utilize the very safe and effective medication appears to be driven more by greed than an actual concern for patient health and well-being. That said, failure to use this effective, safe, inexpensive medication to treat patients who are forced onto ventilators which may cause damage to their lungs, is gross malpractice to the extent it is criminal. “Knowingly causing harm to another.”
The NAZI DOCTORS (by Robert Lifton) is a book about how German doctors became part of the medicalized genocide in NAZI Germany.
Today, the majority of physicians are Silent in the face of DEADLY Fake Vaccines, Vaccination Mandates by Hospitals (enforced against their own employees) and the denial of proven therapeutics like Monoclonal Antibodies and Ivermectin.
Today's NAZI DOCTORS have chosen hospital priviledges over their Hippocratic oaths to First do NO
Thank you Emily - I shared on GAB. God Bless and keep this Doctor and you! Thank you for what you do!
Thank you for supporting her. She's getting hit from all sides and needs the public to come to her defense.
We love real doctors like Doctor Bowden! Not these evil, genocidal doctors who get off on causing suffering and death because they can.
Emily,
Thank you for alerting us to the situation with Dr Bowden!
I’m a proud patient of Dr. Bowden. Thank you Emily.
I'm so glad that her patients have stood behind her as she takes on the entire medical field because all that matters is good medical care. Thank you for letting me know !
Thank you for standing up. If my post stays on FB long enough before being sensored and removed I have passionate friends that will share. May GOD'S HOLY SPIRIT give you PEACE during this time!
Dr Bowden is an amazing caring doctor she treated both me and my son with Ivermectin due to covid it works amazingly she got us the right dose in my opinion it’s the best thing for covid and it works for any stage of the vires Joanie Herring
The medical profession as well as the clinical literature profession is at the brink of ruin. The “science” behind the vaccine mandate hysteria is anything but. The vaccine does not provide immunity. It also does not help prevent spread. This is all about money, power and control. Unfortunately, many people have willingly handed over their freedom to a bureaucracy that ultimately has no interest in then. These same people would strip naked and run into oncoming traffic if it meant continuing access to Tik Tok.
Joe I was thinking about you when I was writing this because you've been saying this would happen all year and now it is and it's tragic. If the public cant trust the government and can't trust the doctors, what do we do?
Civil disobedience. People need to push back. Not be afraid to call BS on the lies. We just need to be fearless and understand that if push comes to shove, our Constitution is very clear regarding the necessary response to tyrannical rule. If some of our “betters” don’t stand up and fight for us, we may have no choice but to fight back. I thought results of last Tuesday’s elections would help, but it’s clear that we lived through a color revolution and for better or worse, Marxists have taken control of our government and we really need to call it out and stop pussy footing around.
Ivermectin is listed as the #2 drug to treat Covid-19 on NIHs own website. Also listed on PubMed https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/ Those who try to save themselves by saying they were only following orders, will not escape justice.
The lawyer told me today that NIH only moved it to that spot a couple months ago? That it as in a "not to use" category before? I need to et the back story clearer but things are showing that the the refusal all this time was totally political.
That's correct. Note that the neutral stance of NIH is the same level of support they offer for convalescent plasma. Yet Houston Methodist says Dr. Bowden is not following science while in their own article (Sept. 10) offering 5 reasons not to use ivermectin for COVID they give as the 5th reason that FDA approved methods already exist, and list convalescent plasma! (Along with monoclonal antibodies, which Dr. Bowden uses if she can get her hands on it, and remdesivir, which WHO recommends against, and for which scientific support is pretty sketchy, and some people suspect NIH/NIAID financial conflicts of interest on).
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/ From the NIH COVID19 Treatment Guidelines.
Ivermectin:
Recommendation
There is insufficient evidence for the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19. Results from adequately powered, well-designed, and well-conducted clinical trials are needed to provide more specific, evidence-based guidance on the role of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19.
Rationale
Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures.13 However, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies suggest that achieving the plasma concentrations necessary for the antiviral efficacy detected in vitro would require administration of doses up to 100-fold higher than those approved for use in humans.14,15 Even though ivermectin appears to accumulate in the lung tissue, predicted systemic plasma and lung tissue concentrations are much lower than 2 µM, the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro.16-19 Subcutaneous administration of ivermectin 400 µg/kg had no effect on SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in hamsters. However, there was a reduction in olfactory deficit (measured using a food-finding test) and a reduction in the interleukin (IL)-6:IL-10 ratio in lung tissues.20
Since the last revision of this section of the Guidelines, the results of several randomized trials and retrospective cohort studies of ivermectin use in patients with COVID-19 have been published in peer-reviewed journals or have been made available as manuscripts ahead of peer review. Some clinical studies showed no benefits or worsening of disease after ivermectin use,21-24 whereas others reported shorter time to resolution of disease manifestations that were attributed to COVID-19,25-27 greater reduction in inflammatory marker levels,26 shorter time to viral clearance,21 or lower mortality rates in patients who received ivermectin than in patients who received comparator drugs or placebo.21,27
However, most of these studies had incomplete information and significant methodological limitations, which make it difficult to exclude common causes of bias. These limitations include:
The sample size of most of the trials was small.
Various doses and schedules of ivermectin were used.
Some of the randomized controlled trials were open-label studies in which neither the participants nor the investigators were blinded to the treatment arms.
Patients received various concomitant medications (e.g., doxycycline, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, zinc, corticosteroids) in addition to ivermectin or the comparator drug. This confounded the assessment of the efficacy or safety of ivermectin.
The severity of COVID-19 in the study participants was not always well described.
The study outcome measures were not always clearly defined.
Those Who Created Covid WILL Hang—CCP Says It Won’t Be Them.
In 2019, National Biosafety Laboratory, Wuhan had leaked COVID-19 bioweapons.Deep State had introduced Covid-19 into US in order to allowed some states in US to use ‘mail-in ballots’ and ‘vote counters’ to remove President Trump from his seat.
Forensic audit!
What a blessing when doctors actually adhere to their vow! Ivermectin IS FDA approved and not approved by default 'emergency' label but truly tested and approved with little to no side affects. When someone is dying to deny a drug that scientifically stops the RNA production of the virus, is inhumane and honestly murder. Not only is it the best chance at survival, it is insane that anyone would have to even go to the courts to get approval for a doctor to dispense an FDA approved drug. What is this even about and why is this being allowed???? This is insanity! IF the 'vaccine' was truly a 'vaccine' that would be one thing but the point is that regardless if you are 'vaccinated' or not you CAN spread this virus. Why are we not combating it from all directions and with any potential drug that even is remotely effective? Please stick this out and do what is right MAYBE you can lead some doctors that may be on the fence and need a leader. Don't stop, continue to do the right thing! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufy2AweXRkc
I do appreciate this doctor being willing to treat the non vaxxed. She is certainly at her discretion to choose whom to render medical services too so long as she continues to observe the Hippocratic Oath.
She's brave to take this stand publicly.She said she did it so other doctors might too. I should have written in my story- and maybe will add-- is that unvaccinated also includes all the people with natural immunity who don't need the vaccine (despite the CDC push). So she's treating mostly people who are not going to get COVID but can't go to other doctors and facilities. Plus, she's treating those with COVID with antibodies and getting great results and keeping them out of the hospitals. For these things, the doctors in Houston are trashing her and trying to her license revoked. Shame.
I am a family nurse practitioner in Central Texas and was reported to the Board of Nursing last month for “inappropriately giving ivermectin to treat Covid” and currently fighting to keep my license if 25 years. 100% of my patients that received ivermectin early (meaning <7days since diagnosis) did very well, tolerated the medication with minimal side effects and recovered completely.
I was devastated that I was reported and my livelihood threatened. A patient asked me “if you knew that this fallout would occur, would you have written?”
And my answer is 1000 times yes, I would still have written because I know it saved 3 lives and it prevented prolonged illness and hospitalizations.
It is not against the Board of Nursing, the Texas Medical Board or the Texas State Board of Pharmacy to write FDA approved drugs for off-label use.
Why would any provider be attacked for writing a medication that not only did no harm but clearly decreased suffering?
I am just seeing your comment. Would you consider going public about your case ? This is outrageous.
The next epidemic will be of those already vaccinated. It's happening in Germany now!
Thank you 😊
Why is this still happening today? Ivermectin has been used in humans for almost 50 years. The article from the National Library of Medicine provides insight into just how safe and how much this one drug has helped in our effort to help people heal from a broad range of infection/disease. The failure of our current medical community and hospital administrators to utilize the very safe and effective medication appears to be driven more by greed than an actual concern for patient health and well-being. That said, failure to use this effective, safe, inexpensive medication to treat patients who are forced onto ventilators which may cause damage to their lungs, is gross malpractice to the extent it is criminal. “Knowingly causing harm to another.”
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3043740/
Just curious: why doesn’t the patient remove himself from the care of the hospital and you treat him directly in his home?
The NAZI DOCTORS (by Robert Lifton) is a book about how German doctors became part of the medicalized genocide in NAZI Germany.
Today, the majority of physicians are Silent in the face of DEADLY Fake Vaccines, Vaccination Mandates by Hospitals (enforced against their own employees) and the denial of proven therapeutics like Monoclonal Antibodies and Ivermectin.
Today's NAZI DOCTORS have chosen hospital priviledges over their Hippocratic oaths to First do NO
Harm.
She should invoke the federal Right To Try law.